נתח דרשות ומדיה בעדשה תיאולוגית

זה מזהה חששות רטוריים ואקזגטיים ספציפיים. זה לא מכריז על אף אחד כ"מורה שקר" — זה לא תפקיד הבינה המלאכותית.

כן. בחר קתולי, אורתודוקסי, רפורמי או מסורת אחרת כנקודת ייחוס. הניתוח מתעדכן בהתאם.

כל ממצא כולל ציטוטים. אמת מול המקורות הראשוניים.

Yes, but carefully. The Detector evaluates claims that mix theology with politics — Christian nationalism rhetoric, liberation theology arguments, social gospel statements — against the tradition you select. It flags category errors and theological overreach on either side of a debate, not partisan opinion.

Yes. Paste the transcript or a link — the tool reads public transcripts where they exist. Long-form sermons and podcasts work better than short clips; the AI needs enough context to judge argument structure fairly.

Neither — by design. The tool measures against the tradition you pick. A conservative Reformed frame and a progressive Anglican frame will flag different sermons for different reasons. The Christian AI is calibrated to your selection, not to a political aesthetic.

Yes — many pastors do, and it is a valuable practice. The AI will flag unclear exegesis, rhetorical patterns that manipulate rather than persuade, and moments where enthusiasm outran the text. Use it as a mirror before preaching, not as a replacement for human editors.

Classical ones — straw-manning opposing views, ad hominem, false dichotomies, appeals to fear, shame, urgency, or tribal loyalty, guilt-by-association, proof-texting, and others. It explains each flag briefly so you can judge whether the rhetorical move was fair in context.

Yes. Export the analysis as PDF or Markdown with citations intact. Several churches use the tool in leadership meetings to evaluate guest speakers or media their youth ministry consumes — as a conversation starter, never as a final verdict.

Short clips are free on the daily quota. Paid plans expand length, unlock the Expert model for denser doctrinal analysis, and permit batch processing for larger sermon archives.